2011.05.03. 07:12 Krisztus rabszolgája

And WHY, dear Savior--tell me why

And WHY, dear Savior--tell me why,
You thus would suffer, bleed and die?
What mighty motive could Thee move,
The motive's plain--'twas all for love!

For love of whom? Of sinners base,
A hardened herd, a rebel race!
That mocked and trampled on Thy blood,
And trifled with the wounds of God!

They nailed Him to the accursed tree;
They did, my brethren--and so did we!
The soldier pierced His side, 'tis true;
But we have pierced Him through and through!

Szólj hozzá!

2011.01.08. 14:24 Krisztus rabszolgája

Egy tréfás kedvű ember szerint a történelem legsúlyosabb porvihara kerekedne ha a Szentírás olvasását elhanyagoló gyülekezeti tagok mindannyian egyszerre porolnák le a Bibliájukat.

(Donald S. Whitney: A keresztyén és a lelki fegyelem)

Szólj hozzá!

2011.01.07. 10:20 Krisztus rabszolgája

mystery stewardship (10)


Have you watched the movie at the end?

"The Rack" "Skull Crusher" "Iron Maiden" "Chair of Nails"

Most Christians are not well acquainted with the "Catholic Inquisition". Though we realize that it is not "politically correct"--we offer the following instructive excerpt by Richard Bennett, a former Roman Catholic Dominican Priest:

The torture chambers of the Inquisition lasted 605 years and were found throughout the nations controlled by Papal Rome. They had their beginning under Pope Innocent III in 1203 until the Inquisition's final dissolution in Spain and Portugal in 1808.

The Instruments of Torture

"The Rack" is one of the best known forms of medieval torture. This mechanism operated by having the victim lie on a horizontal rack with his hands and ankles tied to rollers on opposite ends.

The Inquisitors would perform the interrogation while turning the rollers, stretching the body of the suspect and causing colossal pain. They would stretch the body out until the joints were actually yanked from their sockets. The ultimate intent was that of killing the victim either through shock or injuries. If the believer were still alive, yet refused to submit, he or she was sent to be burned at the stake.

The Inquisitors also used "Skull Crusher." They ordered the believer's chin to be placed on a lower bar and a screw then forced an iron cap down on his or her head. Their teeth could be crushed. Their eyes could be squeezed from their sockets.

It was hoped that the believer was so overcome by the extreme pain of having his head crushed, would confess his alleged errors and believe in the Holy Mother Church.

The Inquisitors also used the "Iron Maiden." It was a tomb-sized container with folding doors. The spiked studded arms wrapped around the victim in such a way so as to puncture parts of the entire body, including the ears and eyes.

The purpose of the use of Iron Maiden was to inflict pain by means of vicious spikes and a slow death. The prickles inside were designed so that the trapped believer was left to slowly die in the utmost pain.

A prisoner would be bidden to stand right in front of the "Iron Maiden" prior to torture. The spring would be touched by the executioner and the Iron Maiden would fling open her arms, and the wretched victim would straightway be forced within them. Another spring was then touched and the Iron Maiden closed upon her victim. Then spiky arms of the Iron Maiden slowly but irresistibly closed upon the man, cruelly goring him.

The talons of the Iron Maiden, sometimes called the "Iron Virgin," were not designed to kill outright. They trapped the prisoner who was left to slowly perish in the utmost pain.

Beside these instruments of torture there were others for the tearing and ripping of one's flesh. The Catholic Church learned a human being could live until the skin was peeled down to the waist. Often the torturers heated these instruments and then used them on women's breasts and the genital organs of both sexes.

There were also instruments for compressing the fingers until the bones would be squeezed into splinters.

There were instruments for tearing out the tongue, for scooping out the eyes, and for rooting out the ears.

There was a bunch of iron cords with a spiked circle at the end of every whip for tearing the flesh from the back until bone and sinew were laid bare.

There were also iron cases for the legs, which were tightened upon the limb placed in them by means of a screw, till flesh and bone were reduced to a pulp.

The thumbscrews were also applied to crush prisoners' toes, while larger, heavier devices based on the same design principle were applied to destroy knees and elbows.

The "chair of nails," used by Inquisitors, was studded with spikes. The victim was strapped naked in the chair and a fire was lit beneath it. Heavy objects were placed upon the victim to increase the pain of the spikes. Blows with mallets were also used to inflict more pain.

There were also devices to slowly and painfully remove the intestines and other organs from the body while keeping the person alive and conscious of the pain.

Any one of those horrors could be inflicted on anybody, i.e., man, woman, or child over the age of 12 that did not agree with the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church. The Inquisition was carried out in France, Holland, Germany, Spain, and Italy.

  ~  ~  ~  ~  ~

"These all died in faith without having received the promises, they only saw them and welcomed them from a distance. And they admitted that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth!" Hebrews 11:13

If you want to know more about the "Catholic Inquisition", or desire to see pictures of the actual "instruments of torture," you might want to read this whole informative article, "The Systematic Murder of Believers!"

You can also watch a most interesting 58 minute video on the Catholic Inquisition.

From http://www.gracegems.org/


No. The reading was enough.




One from me...

You know my fond feelings towards "relative" and "interpretation" - sounds like church is changing interpretations of bible (yet) again...

I wonder what would they teach in, say, 100 years. in 200 years? alas, we will never know.

God was behind Big Bang, universe no accident: Pope

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) – God's mind was behind complex scientific theories such as the Big Bang, and Christians should reject the idea that the universe came into being by accident, Pope Benedict said on Thursday.

"The universe is not the result of chance, as some would want to make us believe," Benedict said on the day Christians mark the Epiphany, the day the Bible says the three kings reached the site where Jesus was born by following a star.

"Contemplating it (the universe) we are invited to read something profound into it: the wisdom of the creator, the inexhaustible creativity of God," he said in a sermon to some 10,000 people in St Peter's Basilica on the feast day.

While the pope has spoken before about evolution, he has rarely delved back in time to discuss specific concepts such as the Big Bang, which scientists believe led to the formation of the universe some 13.7 billion years ago.

Researchers at CERN, the nuclear research center in Geneva, have been smashing protons together at near the speed of light to simulate conditions that they believe brought into existence the primordial universe from which stars, planets and life on earth -- and perhaps elsewhere -- eventually emerged.

Some atheists say science can prove that God does not exist, but Benedict said that some scientific theories were "mind limiting" because "they only arrive at a certain point ... and do not manage to explain the ultimate sense of reality ..."

He said scientific theories on the origin and development of the universe and humans, while not in conflict with faith, left many questions unanswered.

"In the beauty of the world, in its mystery, in its greatness and in its rationality ... we can only let ourselves be guided toward God, creator of heaven and earth," he said.

Benedict and his predecessor John Paul have been trying to shed the Church's image of being anti-science, a label that stuck when it condemned Galileo for teaching that the earth revolves around the sun, challenging the words of the Bible.

Galileo was rehabilitated and the Church now also accepts evolution as a scientific theory and sees no reason why God could not have used a natural evolutionary process in the forming of the human species.

The Catholic Church no longer teaches creationism -- the belief that God created the world in six days as described in the Bible -- and says that the account in the book of Genesis is an allegory for the way God created the world.

But it objects to using evolution to back an atheist philosophy that denies God's existence or any divine role in creation. It also objects to using Genesis as a scientific text.


Three questions and five remarks:
q1 - geneva scientist are smashing protons together... to imitate T0. On day of T0 where did the protons come from? who did what to get protons? oh, I forgot: protons existed from all eternity before, therefore protons = God. grow up, man!
r1 - I read books that were written by people who lived up to 500 years before. and they believe the same as I, or I as them. So time does not change anything in the essence of the TRUE faith. I have the same opinion on as many as 100 things to be believed, down to the last detail and shadow. only false faiths change over time, they multiply, diversify, and come closer to truth, therefore more difficult to recognize as false. therefore the true interpretation of the true Bible does not change over time, only the misinterpretations do. the Bible does not change over time. I have a Bible that is close to 200 years old.
q2 - why would want some to make us believe the universe is here by chance? why is it important, so crucial? who cares? and who cares to say otherwise? and why?
q3 - what is Big Bang? If Big Bang is the sudden creation and expansion of worlds, waters, stars and galaxies, all in one day, oh! I assure you it was a Big Bang! Good thing there was Someone awsomely bigger behind it, otherwise who knows where my eyes would have been? Probably in my

r2 - when Galileo taught that the earth revolves around the sun, he was not challenging the words of the Bible, but the misinterpretation of the Bible of the misled leaders of his time. The Bible clearly teaches today and taught then that the Earth is round, it is hung in space on nothing, it was created, it suffered a flood (from waters from below and waters from above) and it will be destroyed by fire (from fires from above and fires probably from below and inside). have you read it?
r3 - just because "the (Catholic) Church now also accepts evolution as a scientific theory and sees no reason why God could not have used a natural evolutionary process in the forming of the human species" it doesn't mean there aren't several very serious reasons! ask someone of the real Church!
r4 - exactly because "It (the Catholic Church) also objects to using Genesis as a scientific text" it ceases to be the true church; this is the proof that they are off, and don't believe the Bible. God said he created the world. Jesus said He is God, and He said He created the world. If the Pope is Vicarius Dei, or the vicar (substitute/representative) of God on earth, he is either a bad vicar, or a vicar of a different god.
r5 - oh, yes, we WILL know, one day, who taught what, and why! we will have all eternity to analyse, and thank being saved out of all lies and falsehood, by grace throught the sacrifice of Jesus.




Szólj hozzá!

2010.11.25. 14:57 Krisztus rabszolgája


The following story is reported to be a true story. 

Robert the Bruce, a young soldier, found himself in a terrible battle during the Scottish Reformation around 1300. The enemy was soundly defeating this young man's army. He and his comrades found themselves hastily retreating from the battlefield in defeat, running away in fear of their very lives. The enemy gave chase. This young man ran hard and fast, full of fear and desperation, and soon found himself cut off from his comrades in arms.

He eventually came upon a rocky ledge containing a cave. Knowing the enemy was close behind, and that he was exhausted from the chase, he chose to hide there. After he crawled in, he fell to his face in the darkness, desperately crying to God to save him and protect him from his enemies.

When he looked up from his despairing plea for help, he saw a spider beginning to weave its web at the entrance to the cave. As he watched the delicate threads being slowly drawn across the mouth of the cave, the young soldier pondered its irony. He thought, "I asked God for protection and deliverance, and he sent me a spider instead. How can a spider save me?"

His heart was hardened, knowing the enemy would soon discover his hiding place and kill him. And soon he did hear the sound of his enemies, who were now scouring the area looking for those in hiding.

One soldier with a gun slowly walked up to the cave's entrance. As the young man crouched in the darkness, hoping to surprise the enemy in a last-minute desperate attempt to save his own life, he felt his heart pounding wildly out of control.

As the enemy cautiously moved forward to enter the cave, he came upon the spider's web, which by now was completely strung across the opening. He backed away and called out to a comrade, "There can't be anyone in here. They would have had to break this spider's web to enter the cave. Let's move on."

Years later, a young man wrote about that ordeal: "Where God is, a spider's web is as a stone wall. Where God is not, a stone wall is as a spider's web."

I love that line. Where God is, a spider's web is as a stone wall. Where God is not, a stone wall is as a spider's web. How true! "We will shout for joy when you are victorious and will lift up our banners in the name of our God. May the LORD grant all your requests. Now I know that the LORD saves his anointed; he answers him from his holy heaven with the saving power of his right hand. Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Psalm 20:5-7)

Szólj hozzá!

2010.11.12. 09:44 Krisztus rabszolgája

...mystery stewardship...(9)


I heard a joke that you may appreciate (or not)...

We all know that we can thank monks who, for thousands of years, were the ones to copy various documents, the Bible, etc. and transfer the knowledge for the future generations.

Well, one day a monk who had been copying a document so many times, went to the abbot and asked:

- Abbot, I have been copying this document for so many years, but then I started to wonder, what if the original is wrong???

The abbot thought for a second and very politely replied:

- Look, we have been doing this for thousands of years, I can assure you the system works, so you can go to your desk and continue with what you are working on.

So did the monk. The next morning however he heard this banging sound from somewhere. He stood up and started to walk around to see from where this sound was coming. It lead him to the basement where all the originals have been kept. He saw the abbot banging his head on the table crying. He asked:

- Abbot, why are you doing this...


- The word was "CELEBRATE"...

This is good!

Especially because celibacy is not required by the Bible (though it is discussed and presented as a higher way, but not for everybody!). I'm amazed at how clear the Bible is on all questions, and people have a hard time understanding it.

As someone said: it's not will-power people lack, but won't power.
And neither is monastical life of any help. The evil is inside, you can't get away from it, wherever you go, it's right there with you. Someone else said that even the most wonderful prayer of the most holy man contains so much sin, it would be enough to damn ten thousand worlds. God is really holy, and it's crazy to think that we're still alive, in spite of His holynes. There must be another character trait He has that keeps him from burning us up instantly.

Grace to you! (www.gty.org, remember? Pick an interesting sermon, and listen to it.)

Szólj hozzá!

2010.11.12. 07:56 Krisztus rabszolgája

Titok sáfár (07)

Barat: Mit jelent a “revival” szo?

Rabszolga: Nagyon jo kerdes! Orszagos szintu, lathato, erzekelheto, eredmenyekkel, VALTOZASSAL jaro lelki ebredes.

Isten letezesenek es jellemenek/tulajdonsagainak/elvarasainak es igereteinek mersekelt megismerese, eszlelese, megtapasztalasa.

Ez MINDIG Istentol fugg, attol, hogy O, szuveren modon, ugy dont, hogy egy adott korszakban kijelenti/kinyilatkoztatja magat jobban, vagy nem.

Mindig egy emberrel kezdodik, (ugye minden egy emberrel kezdodott), aki miutan ezt ateli, teljes szivvel es erobedobassal kuzd, hogy az ujjat eladja/atadja a korulotte levoknek is.

Isten az abszolut JO, es tokeletes leny. Amikor valaki rajon, (Istennek koszonhetoen, mivel mikor o magat kijelenti, az ember BIZTOS rajon!) hogy amit addig hitt/szeretett/ertekelt/imadott, akar az Istent (helytelen/tokeletlen imerettel), vagy mas istent, nem a legjobb volt, hanem a JO masabb, jobb, akkor beleszeret, csodalja, imadja es az egesz kornyeket rabeszeli. Isten az o bizonysagtetelet/vallomasat felhasznalja arra, hogy a tobbi embert is meggyozze. Isten kinyilatkoztatja magat azokban is, termeszetfeletti munkalkodas altal, amit a Szentharomsagbeli harmadik szemely, a Szent Lelek vegez el.
Ez a konnyebbik resze a kerdesnek. A nehezebbik ez: miert dont ugy Isten, ha mar a revival mindenkinek jo, (Neki mert mersekelt tisztesseget es imadatot jelent, ami az o VEGSO celja, nekunk, mert az abszolut JO-nak engedelmeskedve es szeretve minden jora valtozik), hogy ezt a high-t, ami a lelki ebredes, nem tartja fent, vagy nem adja mindig, folyamatosan.

Valasz: olvasd el a Jozsue konyvet, a Bibliabol.

Szólj hozzá!

2010.09.22. 12:27 Krisztus rabszolgája

Titok sáfár (06)

Tovabbi alapigazsagok megosztasa. Barat feketevel, rabszolga zolddel. Hirdettessek a jo hir minden hallo fulnek!

A saját erőből való "engedelmesség" nem visz előre, de a "bűnbánó szívet nem veted meg ó Uram"!

Hat hogyan vetne meg, hisz o adta! Nagy fonaksag lenne a reszerol, hogy mevesse azt ami akarata szerinti, amit kimunkalt a Lelek altal! Orul az ember, annak is, hogy mikor vegre banta, Isten nem vetette meg. Milyen jo, Uram, hogy nem vetetted meg. Milyen jo, hogy meghallgatod imadsagainkat.

A hited szerint, mivel minden ember csak a rosszat akarja, ergo, egy ember sem akarja elfogadni Isten bocsánatát sem.

Elnezest, nem az en hitem szerint, hanem a Biblia szerint. amint meg van írva: "Nincsen igaz ember egy sem, nincsen, aki értse, nincsen, aki keresse Istent. Mind elhajlottak, valamennyien megromlottak, és nincsen, aki jót tegyen, nincs egyetlen egy sem (roma 3, zsoltar 14, zsoltar 53). Ezzel van a baj, a te bajod, az arminianizmus baja: hogy a teljes romlottsagot nem hiszitek, nem ismeritek el. Ha helytelen a diagnozis, helytelen a kezelesi modszer is!

Azonban mivel egyesek üdvözülnek, és persze van szó a Bibliában eleve elrendelésről és kiválasztásról (nem is kevés),

Ami minden jozan eszu embernek csak egyetlen dolgot jelenthet: azt amit jelent. Az eleve elrendeles eleve elrendelest jelent, a Biblia kijelenti, ti pedig nem hiszitek.

azokból azt következteted, hogy némely embert kiválaszt Isten, és elvégzi, hogy akarjon, és így megmenekülhessen.

Megmenekuljon, nem “hessen”. Es nem kovetkeztetem, hanem olvasom.

Ennek hallatára örvendeztek a pogányok, és magasztalták az Úr igéjét, és akik az örök életre választattak, mindnyájan hívővé lettek. Őbenne lettünk örököseivé is, mivel eleve elrendeltettünk erre annak kijelentett végzése szerint, aki mindent saját akarata és elhatározása szerint cselekszik; Mert akiket eleve kiválasztott, azokról eleve el is rendelte, hogy hasonlókká legyenek Fia képéhez, hogy ő legyen az elsőszülött sok testvér között. Akikről pedig ezt eleve elrendelte, azokat el is hívta, és akiket elhívott, azokat meg is igazította, akiket pedig megigazított, azokat meg is dicsőítette.

Szólj hozzá!

2010.09.15. 13:33 Krisztus rabszolgája

Titok sáfár (05)

Ezeket az általános vagy külső hívással hívottakat mi célból hívja Isten?

Ez konnyu: azert, mert azt akarja, hogy mindenki aki hallja a parancsot, megterjen.

Mate 22:8 Akkor monda az õ szolgáinak: A menyegzõ ugyan készen van, de a hivatalosok nem valának méltók.

Abbol a celbol hiv masokat is, hogy megmutassa az O dicsoseget az o bunossegukben, bunosseguk nagysagaban; milyen nagy ellenszegulest is le tud gyozni kegyelme vonzasaval. Milyen vastag rablancokat le tud torni. Milyen vitez szabadito. Milyen hatalmas ur. Es mit jelent mindvegig szeretni.

Hogy megmutassa mennyire nem valok az emberek a mennybe, mennyire nem lehet erdem szerint, onerobol, besegites nelkul oda bejutni; hogy mindenki aki ott talalja magat, vilagosan lassa, hogy nem maganak koszonheti. Nem maga dontotte el vegso allapotat. Mindenki csak annyira kepes, hogy a karhozatra dontse vegso allapotat.

Hogy megmutassa mennyire lesulyedtek, mennyire halottak, suketek, engedetlenek, engedetlenseg ala zarottak, rosszak, gonoszak.

Hogy megmutassa milyen utalatos a bun (hogy kepes meg valami szent dologgal is, mint a torveny, halalra juttatni embereket, es az evangeliumnak is, ami Isten hatalma, ellenalni es halalba juttatni a bunost)

Hogy megmutassa milyen szornyu a satan rabsagaban lenni, az ellenszegules allapotaban lenni (és milyen mérhetetlenül nagy az ő hatalma rajtunk, hívőkön; milyen nagy hatalom kellett hogy munkalkodjon, hogy mi ebbol az allapotbol kiszabadultunk; milyen nagy dolog kivalasztott lenni, es ezert jobban orulni, szeretni es kitartani, ebbol megfekezo erot nyerni, es magasztalni kegyelmenek nagysagat, hogy nekunk megkegyelmezett);

Hogy megmutassa mit jelent nem engedelmeskedni neki, megtagadni azt az alapigazsagot, amely vilagosan ki van jelentve. Ha azzal kezded, hogy nem ismered el Isten letezeset, amelyet a teremtes es a lelkiismeret torvenye bizonyit (ezt minden egyes valaha elo embernek a vilagon, tehat a karhoztatas es a jogos itelet alapja megvan mindenkivel szemben), akkor orokre elastad magad. Termeszetesen ha nem tagadtad meg, es istenfelo voltal, zsido-keresztyen vilagkeped volt, azt sem magadnak koszonheted, hanem Isten megfekezo erejenek. Azok a poganyok, akik nem tagadjak meg az altalanosan megismerheto igazsagot, kapnak misszionariust, aki elmondja nekik Jezus evangeliumat. Dehat ez sem lehet erdem szerint. Ha nem tagadtak meg Isten letezeset, nem maguknak koszonhetik, hanem a vilagban uralkodo Szent Leleknek.

Hogy megmutassa az eljövendő korszakokban kegyelmének mérhetetlen gazdagságát irántunk való jóságából Krisztus Jézusban. Efezus 2:7: hogy megmutassa jelenben es jovoben, mennyen es foldon minden embernek es ellenszegulo hatalomnak, es a valasztott nem bukott angyaloknak a kegyelem jelenteset: mit jelent megkegyelmezni, valoban megkegyelmezni, elejetol vegig. Semmilyen bennunk levo erdem vagy jo vagy kitunteto, kivalaszto ereny vagy ero vagy kepesseg miatt.

Az Isten pedig nem haragját akarta-e megmutatni és hatalmát megláttatni, és nem ezért hordozta-e türelemmel a harag eszközeit, amelyek pusztulásra készültek? Vajon nem azért is, hogy megláttassa dicsőségének gazdagságát az irgalom eszközein, amelyeket dicsőségre készített. Roma 9:22-23.


Szólj hozzá!

2010.09.06. 11:18 Krisztus rabszolgája

Titok sáfár (04)

Barat visszajott rozsaszinnel (valaszul rabszolga kekjere), rabszolga valaszol zolddel.



A nap nem sut mindenkire, mert nem mindenki hallott Jezus neverol.

* Egy mindnyájunk által elfogadott tézis. A Biblia abszolút igazságaiból szabad csak kiindulni! ISTEN TÖKÉLETES, ISTEN A SZERETET, ISTEN NEM SZEMÉLYVÁLOGATÓ, Ergo: Isten szeretete mindenkire árad!

Kedves barat, probalnek rovid lenni, de latom ez nyulik mint a gumi. A Biblia abszolut igazsagai kozul kifelejtesz 2 fontosat: Isten szuveren, es minden pontosan akarata es terve szerint tortenik. Az emberek nem Isten vegso akarata ellen karhoznak el. Ezt te is mondtad mar: lenne hatalma, megtehetne, hogy mindenkit udvozitsen. Ha mar nem is vallod, hogy valakivel megtette volna, hogy „akarata ellenere“ azaz romlott akaratat megvaltoztatva vezette az udvossegre, legalabb annyit azert meg kellen adj Istennek, hogy lenne ra hatalma (Isten iranyitja a sziveket is, tudja inditani, fekezni, kemenyiteni, lagyitani es megnyitni). Ha ugy latta volna jonak, akkor mindenkit a mennybe VITT volna. De nem ugy latta jonak. Ebben egyetertunk. Maskepp akarta. Nem akarta, a donto akarataval, hogy mindenki udvozuljon. Itt ket dolog van: ahol azt irja, nem akarja hogy egyikuk sem elvesszen, vagy akarja hogy mindenki udvozuljon, ott a valasztottak kozul senki elveszni es kozuluk mindenki kell es fog udvozulni, igen, a Lelek ellenallhatatlan vezetesenek / meggyozesenek/ vonzasanak koszonhetonen. A Leleknek van hatalma mindeneket maga ala vetni (fil. 3:21, itt nem az allatokrol es az esorol van szo, hanem valoban mindenrol). Az Atya mindent atadott Krisztusnak, minden hatalmat, meg az elkepzelt kilincstelen ajtoju szivnek a kilincset is. Es a Fiuval egyutt minden valasztottnak neki ajandekoz mindent, a hitet, megterest es udvosseget is. A masik dolog az, hogy “nem kivanja a bunos vesztet”, vagyis nem orul neki. Ha megakarja mutatni igazsagat is, akkor kellenek karhozandok is, vagy dicsoseget a harag edenyein, akkor kellenek ellenszegulok is. De nem karorvendo, inkabb szomorkodik, de azt is csak pontos mertekben, mert el sem kepzelhetjuk, hogy majd siratni fogjuk az elveszendoket, vagy a mennyben vegig fog Isten es minden udvozult szomorkodni. Inkabb dicsoiteni fogjuk ot, hogy a bunosoket elpusztitotta.

Szólj hozzá!

2010.09.02. 09:05 Krisztus rabszolgája

Titok sáfár (03)

Tovabbi titkokat beszelunk meg egy barattal. Barat kezdi, rozsaszinnel. Rabszolga valaszol, feketevel. Akinek van fule a hallasra, hallja!


Teves, barat, teves! Meg mindig csak teves, es nem is lehet mas csak teves amig nem erted az iget. Isten nem egyforman kezel mindenkit, hanem ketforman. Keresztel Lelekkel es tuzzel (Én vízzel keresztellek titeket, hogy megtérjetek, de aki utánam jön, erősebb nálam: arra sem vagyok méltó, hogy a saruját vigyem. Ő majd Szentlélekkel és tűzzel keresztel titeket. Kezében szórólapát van, és megtisztítja szérűjét: a gabonáját csűrbe takarítja, a pelyvát pedig megégeti olthatatlan tűzzel.). De nem ugyanazokat! Rendet rak a szerujen: egyeseket be, masokat ki. Szetvalasztja a kecskeket a baranyoktol. O valassza szet. Nem maguk, cselekedeteik vagy erdemeik folytan valasszak szet magukat. Nem valami bennunk levo miatt udvozulunk. Nem mi valtjuk ki udvozulesunket, vagy valositjuk meg, vagy kattintjuk at.

Telve van kegyelemmel es igazsaggal (jn. 1:14). De nem ugyanazok fogjak megtapasztalni e ket tulajdonsagat. Egyesek csak igazsagat fogjak megismerni, masok megismerik kegyelmet is, ami nem mas mint szeretet+igazsag.

Szólj hozzá!